A Critique of Cal Pierce's How to Keep Your Healing
Right here, with the title of this article, we are presented with a very important question: Can a person lose a healing that is truly from God? We hope to answer that question by the end of this article.
Each one of us must understand how to receive healing and keep it. When we understand God's word on healing and act upon it, it brings forth a manifestation of healing in our physical bodies.
Where does scripture say that one had to understand all about healing and how to keep it in order to receive it? You will not find it anywhere. Instead people were healed because of their faith:
When these passages are read in context we can see that people's faith was focused in Christ Jesus as the healer--not faith in some man or "prophet" healing them (other than Jesus) and not faith in themselves sustaining that healing through some kind of mental effort either.
Our goal is to receive the manifestation of healing and give our heavenly Father the glory for what Jesus has done for us.
Is God really getting all the glory when someone is "healed" in these Healing Rooms or does the healer get the glory? Did Jesus charge admittance to his healing sessions, like with so many evangelists today? Did Jesus encourage those who were healed to return the favor by supporting him financially? Do people who receive "healing" from these Healing Rooms feel obligated to support that ministry financially?
And furthermore where does scripture instruct us to seek out a full time healer when we are plagued with infirmities? Instead, Scripture instructs us as follows:
And where does scripture say that we need be in the presence of a healer to be healed? Did Jesus need to be present in order for people to be healed?
A Roman Centurion requesting Jesus to heal his servant:
The Canaanite woman [a foreigner and enemy of Israel] reqesting Jesus to heal her daughter:
Sickness is the result of an oppression of the devil. Acts 10:38 says, "...and Jesus went about doing good, and healing all who were oppressed by the devil; for God was with Him." The devil inflicts us with sickness and doesn't like it when God's Word brings healing and destroys his work.
Is it true that sickness is the Devil's fault? What does scripture say?
Therefore, sickness is a natural degeneration of the human body. Man's sickness is a result of his own/Adam's original sin. We live in a fallen world. Sickness is as natural to us as sucking air. When we sin we fall under Satan's control. However, not all is lost. God made a provision for us to be healed if sin is causing our illness as we saw above. If you will notice James said that WHEN we confess our sins and seek prayer from other believers THEN we can be healed. Why? Because Satan's power is then cut short when we confess our sins.
However, not all sickness will be cured by acknowledging sin, because not all sickness is the result of sin. God doesn't always heal sickness--look at Paul and his eye problem for instance. God told him "my Grace is sufficient for you," (2 Corinthians 12:) i.e., I have something to accomplish through you with your sickness, be patient. Therefore, just because a healing doesn't take effect does not mean it is Satan's fault, or ours either. God could have another purpose for someone not being healed.
The devil will always try to reestablish his infliction by stealing the truth of the Word from us. We see this in Matthew 13:19 where it says, "When anyone hears the Word of the kingdom, and does not understand that the evil one comes and snatches away what has been sown in his heart. This is the one on whom seed was sown beside the road."
The enemy wants to steal the Word before it can become firmly rooted in us to produce the healing. The devil knows that the Word of God is more powerful than his work ... sickness, so he must try and cut-off the Word in us before it gets rooted. Only seed rooted can produce a harvest.
Cal is saying that it is because you don't understand the Word that is causing you to not be healed. However, this scripture is speaking of salvation, not healing. Look at the last verse in this passage:
What is the "crop" being referred to in the above verse? It is a crop of believers, i.e., he who hears the word AND understands it can produce a crop of up to a hundred times what was sown, i.e, your words of wisdom can affect a hundred times more people than those who actually hear them. It was the unbelievers in the midst (those who cannot see, cannot hear and therefore cannot understand) who were deprived from the knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven because their hearts had been hardened by their own choice (vs 15). Please notice it is not merely a misunderstanding, but an actual calloused heart that caused them to not hear.
Cal Pierce is apparently claiming that the "crop" is an abundance of healings, i.e., abundant miracles. However, are miracles always of God?
Some miracles will deceive even the elect:
Let's look at Matthew 13:20&21 "And the one on whom seed was sown on the rocky places, this who hears the Word, and immediately receives it with joy; yet he has no firm root in himself, but is only temporary, and when affliction or persecution arises because of the Word, immediately he falls away." When we receive the Word on healing and are prayed for and a healing takes place, we receive it with joy, but it must become firmly rooted in us because the devil will always try to inflict us with the very same symptoms to change our minds. Verse 21 says because of the Word, this affliction will be brought against us once again to cause us to fall away.
What Cal is actually saying is that you must "believe it to receive it" i.e., if your healing isn't evident you are to believe in it anyway or it will be your own fault if your aren't healed. Also, please notice that Cal tries to blame a faulty healing on the Devil again. So now it's either the Devil's fault or your own, i.e., you have just had a guilt trip laid on you. Please notice that this kind of reasoning very effectively deflects any blame on the healer for a failed healing, and a healer who can't heal also loses credibility, and thus financial support.
Did one of Jesus' apostles/disciples ever have a failed healing?
Did Jesus only heal people halfway or in a way that they were unsure if they were healed or not? Where is the verse that says that even ONE of Jesus' healings didn't take???
Who lays guilt trips on people, is the author of deception, lies and distorts scripure, God or Satan?
Not even deliberate disobedience is grounds for a healing to fail according to Scripture. Read the story of the two blind men in Matthew 9:27-31 when, after Jesus healed them, he instructed them not to tell anyone and they did it anyway. Did their healing fail because of it? No.
What could be the purpose for Cal Pierce and all these other "healers" to claim that an un-healing is the person's or Satan's fault? Could it possibly be so these people will go back again, and again, and again to the Healing Rooms (and giving them more and more money each time) in hopes that they will be healed eventually if they can just get their act together? Some of those who sought healing from John G. Lake had to return up to 30 times (none of which has been documented, btw, despite the claims coming out of the Healing Rooms). See Greg DesVoignes in-depth research on this man whom the Healing Rooms claim is their founder in an article called, The Revival of John G. Lake's Ministry.(pdf)
If these "prophets" are supposedly able to heal even better than Jesus, as they claim, then they are doing a real lousy job of it.
The devil will once again bring the symptoms of the sickness to try and convince us that we are not healed. This is a lying vanity. The root meaning of a lying vanity is something that comes against you to change your mind. If the devil can cause us to look at symptoms instead of God's promise, he can convince us to believe his lie. When we focus on the symptoms, pain or whatever it is, doubt and unbelief come to our mind and this gives entrance for fear to re-establish the sickness. We must keep our heart and mind fixed upon God and His promise.
Please notice that Cal Pierce is now claiming that it is a "change of mind" that is causing your un-healing, i.e., you THOUGHT you were healed and now you are THINKING you are not healed. Why? Well, obviously it's because you don't see any proof of healing (which means you probably weren't healed in the first place if Cal Pierce and his ministry is operated by false healers). This also means that Cal Pierce is promoting "Mind over Matter" or "Positive Confession." However, no matter what label you stick on it, if it's coming from somone who is distorting Scripture to try and prove his case, it can't be from God.
Cal Pierce also included a scripture from Jonah to try and prove his case but that was taken out of context also because Jonah ran from God and he wasn't even ill or in need of healing so it doesn't apply here.
And another question--why did Cal Pierce feel the need to mention un-healings in the first place. Could it be because there are a lot of them coming out of the "Healing Rooms"?
Ahhhhh. Here is the clincher:
So when the symptoms return, we must set our faith in God and his Word and tell the enemy, no matter what, we are not going to believe his lies.
Yes, indeed, the symptoms are expected to return. So much for Spokane's Healing Rooms.
The major reason people get swallowed up into false beliefs, like the one we just witnessed above, is because they don't know their scriptures. Therefore, it is of utmost importance that you read your Bible daily--especially in these times of deception.
Be blessed with wisdom and discernment.
Copyright © October 29, 2000.
Return to Spokane Outpouring